<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45791</link>
    <description>A Magistrate has no jurisdiction to set aside a confiscation order passed by the competent customs authority in exercise of customs powers. The validity or jurisdictional propriety of such an order cannot be adjudicated by the Magistrate, and any grievance must be pursued before the proper forum. The direction vacating confiscation and ordering return of the goods was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45791</link>
      <description>A Magistrate has no jurisdiction to set aside a confiscation order passed by the competent customs authority in exercise of customs powers. The validity or jurisdictional propriety of such an order cannot be adjudicated by the Magistrate, and any grievance must be pursued before the proper forum. The direction vacating confiscation and ordering return of the goods was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>