<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 831 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776643</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee exemption under section 10(23C)(v) despite the delay in filing the audit report under section 139(1), holding the deadline as not mandatory in this context. The tribunal recognized that offerings collected by a religious institution do not constitute taxable income and rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding electronic filing of the audit report. Given the assessee&#039;s status as a government-controlled entity with accounts approved by the State Assembly, the tribunal dispensed with technical breaches and directed deletion of the reassessed income computations. The exemption under section 10(23C)(v) was granted in full, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 831 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776643</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee exemption under section 10(23C)(v) despite the delay in filing the audit report under section 139(1), holding the deadline as not mandatory in this context. The tribunal recognized that offerings collected by a religious institution do not constitute taxable income and rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding electronic filing of the audit report. Given the assessee&#039;s status as a government-controlled entity with accounts approved by the State Assembly, the tribunal dispensed with technical breaches and directed deletion of the reassessed income computations. The exemption under section 10(23C)(v) was granted in full, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>