<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 837 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776649</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune upheld the revision order under section 263 confirming that the AO&#039;s original assessment under section 143(3) was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The AO had incorrectly deducted accrued interest income from gross receipts instead of including it in taxable income, despite the assessee following mercantile accounting. The pending appeal before CIT(A) did not challenge this issue, which justified the CIT(E)&#039;s invocation of revisionary powers. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that the interest income was recorded in books and that the assessment should not be reopened. The order directing reassessment to include accrued interest income in taxable income was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 837 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776649</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune upheld the revision order under section 263 confirming that the AO&#039;s original assessment under section 143(3) was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The AO had incorrectly deducted accrued interest income from gross receipts instead of including it in taxable income, despite the assessee following mercantile accounting. The pending appeal before CIT(A) did not challenge this issue, which justified the CIT(E)&#039;s invocation of revisionary powers. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that the interest income was recorded in books and that the assessment should not be reopened. The order directing reassessment to include accrued interest income in taxable income was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>