<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 844 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776656</link>
    <description>The HC held that income tax reassessment proceedings for AY 2020-21, predating the NCLT-approved Resolution Plan, cannot be initiated against the petitioner. The moratorium under CIRP, revived by the SC, protected the petitioner from such proceedings until the Resolution Plan approval extinguished all past claims. Following SC precedent in Ghanshyam Mishra and related HC decisions, the court quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148, ruling that tax claims prior to the Resolution Plan approval are barred. The petition was allowed, preventing the tax authorities from proceeding against the petitioner for alleged escapement of tax for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 844 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776656</link>
      <description>The HC held that income tax reassessment proceedings for AY 2020-21, predating the NCLT-approved Resolution Plan, cannot be initiated against the petitioner. The moratorium under CIRP, revived by the SC, protected the petitioner from such proceedings until the Resolution Plan approval extinguished all past claims. Following SC precedent in Ghanshyam Mishra and related HC decisions, the court quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148, ruling that tax claims prior to the Resolution Plan approval are barred. The petition was allowed, preventing the tax authorities from proceeding against the petitioner for alleged escapement of tax for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>