https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776667 The HC held that the petitioner's contract falls under category B, not category D, regarding GST reimbursement on running bills. The respondent authority failed to follow the prescribed procedure under category A (applicable to category B cases) as per the 06.06.2018 communication. The Court directed the respondents to adhere to the stipulated procedure and refund the 2% GST amount deducted from the petitioner. The respondents must complete this process within three months from receiving the certified order. The petition was allowed. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776667 The HC held that the petitioner's contract falls under category B, not category D, regarding GST reimbursement on running bills. The respondent authority failed to follow the prescribed procedure under category A (applicable to category B cases) as per the 06.06.2018 communication. The Court directed the respondents to adhere to the stipulated procedure and refund the 2% GST amount deducted from the petitioner. The respondents must complete this process within three months from receiving the certified order. The petition was allowed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776667