https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776669 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible ITC by the Petitioner. The Court noted that the Petitioner was fully aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings. The delay in issuance of the impugned order was found to be within the limitation period, as the order was signed and dated on 1st February, 2025, despite the document being uploaded later. The Court held that such callous conduct could not be condoned and declined to interfere, resulting in dismissal of the petition. en-us Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776669 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible ITC by the Petitioner. The Court noted that the Petitioner was fully aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings. The delay in issuance of the impugned order was found to be within the limitation period, as the order was signed and dated on 1st February, 2025, despite the document being uploaded later. The Court held that such callous conduct could not be condoned and declined to interfere, resulting in dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776669