https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776670 The HC held that the writ petition challenging the demand for fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) involving non-existent firms and goods-less invoices amounting to Rs. 8.83 crores is not maintainable. Given the availability of an alternative remedy through the appellate process, the petitioner must pursue appeal rather than writ jurisdiction. The court noted the complexity of ITC transactions and the involvement of multiple noticees, making a consolidated show cause notice impractical. The petitioner is permitted to raise all contentions and submit documents during the appeal. The HC declined to examine the merits under writ jurisdiction and disposed of the petition accordingly. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776670 The HC held that the writ petition challenging the demand for fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) involving non-existent firms and goods-less invoices amounting to Rs. 8.83 crores is not maintainable. Given the availability of an alternative remedy through the appellate process, the petitioner must pursue appeal rather than writ jurisdiction. The court noted the complexity of ITC transactions and the involvement of multiple noticees, making a consolidated show cause notice impractical. The petitioner is permitted to raise all contentions and submit documents during the appeal. The HC declined to examine the merits under writ jurisdiction and disposed of the petition accordingly. Case-Laws GST Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776670