<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (9) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45775</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused. The court held that the accused had satisfactorily discharged the burden under Section 123 of the Customs Act, proving that the seized watches were lawfully imported. The accused was acquitted of the charges, and the bail bond was ordered to be canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (9) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45775</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused. The court held that the accused had satisfactorily discharged the burden under Section 123 of the Customs Act, proving that the seized watches were lawfully imported. The accused was acquitted of the charges, and the bail bond was ordered to be canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>