<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2192 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463200</link>
    <description>Activities of draining, replacement of damaged fencing and laying cement concrete pavement alongside state highways fell within the statutory exemption for road repair under Section 97 of the Finance Act, 2012 for the relevant period. Because the work was connected with road-side work on state highways and was covered by the protected period, it could not be taxed as Management, Maintenance &amp; Repair Service. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 19:00:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2192 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463200</link>
      <description>Activities of draining, replacement of damaged fencing and laying cement concrete pavement alongside state highways fell within the statutory exemption for road repair under Section 97 of the Finance Act, 2012 for the relevant period. Because the work was connected with road-side work on state highways and was covered by the protected period, it could not be taxed as Management, Maintenance &amp; Repair Service. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>