<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45762</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the confiscation of gems valued at Rs. 9,26,586 under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, from a transit passenger arriving from Colombo. The appellant&#039;s failure to declare the goods and behavior indicated an intention to smuggle, supporting the department&#039;s decision. The Court clarified the concept of &quot;import&quot; for transit passengers, emphasizing the need for declaration and bonding of goods. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the departmental orders and penalty of Rs. 5,000, highlighting the importance of compliance and transparency in customs procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45762</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the confiscation of gems valued at Rs. 9,26,586 under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, from a transit passenger arriving from Colombo. The appellant&#039;s failure to declare the goods and behavior indicated an intention to smuggle, supporting the department&#039;s decision. The Court clarified the concept of &quot;import&quot; for transit passengers, emphasizing the need for declaration and bonding of goods. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the departmental orders and penalty of Rs. 5,000, highlighting the importance of compliance and transparency in customs procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>