<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45759</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition seeking to quash an order imposing a personal penalty under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, stating that the Customs Authorities&#039; order was proper and in compliance with the law. The appellant&#039;s argument that notice requirements under Sections 110(2) and 124 of the Customs Act were not met was rejected. The court held that the notice sent by registered post within six months was sufficient, emphasizing proper service of notice. Additionally, the court found the service of notice by registered post, returned with the endorsement &#039;Left&#039;, to be adequate under Section 153 of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45759</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition seeking to quash an order imposing a personal penalty under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, stating that the Customs Authorities&#039; order was proper and in compliance with the law. The appellant&#039;s argument that notice requirements under Sections 110(2) and 124 of the Customs Act were not met was rejected. The court held that the notice sent by registered post within six months was sufficient, emphasizing proper service of notice. Additionally, the court found the service of notice by registered post, returned with the endorsement &#039;Left&#039;, to be adequate under Section 153 of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>