https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52382 The Supreme Court observed that increasing the list of acceptable documents from seven to eleven for the Special Intensive Revision is inclusionary, because electors may submit any one document; petitioners argued exclusionary effects from non acceptance of Aadhaar and limited coverage of some documents, but the bench noted lists are prepared after inter departmental feedback to maximise coverage and that choices about inclusion, exclusion and evidentiary weight rest within the Election Commission's remit. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:31:04 +0530 Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:31:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52382 The Supreme Court observed that increasing the list of acceptable documents from seven to eleven for the Special Intensive Revision is inclusionary, because electors may submit any one document; petitioners argued exclusionary effects from non acceptance of Aadhaar and limited coverage of some documents, but the bench noted lists are prepared after inter departmental feedback to maximise coverage and that choices about inclusion, exclusion and evidentiary weight rest within the Election Commission's remit. News - Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:31:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52382