<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Freezing of 55 Bank Accounts Upheld Under Proceeds of Crime Rules for Fake Cash Receipts and Money Laundering</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91529</link>
    <description>The AT upheld the freezing of 55 bank accounts and seizure of digital devices and documents linked to the appellant, who was found complicit in issuing fake cash receipts and receiving proceeds of crime amounting to Rs. 126 Crores. The appellant manipulated company records and benefited from bounced cheques deposited into personal and associates&#039; accounts. The Tribunal found no illegality in the impugned order, noting the appellant&#039;s involvement was established through witness statements and investigation, despite the initial FIR naming only the company&#039;s MD. The appellant&#039;s claim of being a Commission Agent lacked documentary support and was dismissed as an attempt to conceal proceeds of crime. The Tribunal allowed limited operation of the.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Freezing of 55 Bank Accounts Upheld Under Proceeds of Crime Rules for Fake Cash Receipts and Money Laundering</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91529</link>
      <description>The AT upheld the freezing of 55 bank accounts and seizure of digital devices and documents linked to the appellant, who was found complicit in issuing fake cash receipts and receiving proceeds of crime amounting to Rs. 126 Crores. The appellant manipulated company records and benefited from bounced cheques deposited into personal and associates&#039; accounts. The Tribunal found no illegality in the impugned order, noting the appellant&#039;s involvement was established through witness statements and investigation, despite the initial FIR naming only the company&#039;s MD. The appellant&#039;s claim of being a Commission Agent lacked documentary support and was dismissed as an attempt to conceal proceeds of crime. The Tribunal allowed limited operation of the.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>