<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 710 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776522</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Chandigarh held that the requirement to pay 6% of the sale price of bagasse and press mud under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, does not apply where bagasse is not a manufactured final product. Relying on the Allahabad HC decision, the tribunal ruled that the obligation to reverse CENVAT credit under Rule 1 is not attracted in such cases. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 710 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776522</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Chandigarh held that the requirement to pay 6% of the sale price of bagasse and press mud under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, does not apply where bagasse is not a manufactured final product. Relying on the Allahabad HC decision, the tribunal ruled that the obligation to reverse CENVAT credit under Rule 1 is not attracted in such cases. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>