<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 712 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776524</link>
    <description>The HC held that an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the CEA attains finality and cannot be restored by the CESTAT, which becomes functus officio. No provision exists for restoration of such dismissed appeals unless the dismissal order is set aside by a higher forum. The HC declined to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s order and dismissed the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 712 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776524</link>
      <description>The HC held that an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the CEA attains finality and cannot be restored by the CESTAT, which becomes functus officio. No provision exists for restoration of such dismissed appeals unless the dismissal order is set aside by a higher forum. The HC declined to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s order and dismissed the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>