<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776529</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under money-laundering law may be sustained where the predicate offence is disclosed and material indicates involvement in proceeds of crime, even if the person was not named in the FIR. The Tribunal accepted that an ECIR can be recorded against such a person when the record shows connection with the scheduled offences and the betting racket, and it upheld attachment of the bank accounts. It also stated that provisional attachment orders must identify property with adequate specificity and should not use vague descriptions of movable or immovable assets, although that objection did not result in interference on the facts noted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776529</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under money-laundering law may be sustained where the predicate offence is disclosed and material indicates involvement in proceeds of crime, even if the person was not named in the FIR. The Tribunal accepted that an ECIR can be recorded against such a person when the record shows connection with the scheduled offences and the betting racket, and it upheld attachment of the bank accounts. It also stated that provisional attachment orders must identify property with adequate specificity and should not use vague descriptions of movable or immovable assets, although that objection did not result in interference on the facts noted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>