<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776533</link>
    <description>Applications under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code based on a recovery certificate are treated as governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, giving a three-year limitation period. A recovery certificate may create a fresh cause of action, but it does not extend the period for initiating insolvency proceedings to 12 years under Article 136. The article also notes that acknowledgment after expiry of limitation does not revive a stale claim. On that basis, the Section 95 application is described as time-barred and the 12-year limitation argument as rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776533</link>
      <description>Applications under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code based on a recovery certificate are treated as governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, giving a three-year limitation period. A recovery certificate may create a fresh cause of action, but it does not extend the period for initiating insolvency proceedings to 12 years under Article 136. The article also notes that acknowledgment after expiry of limitation does not revive a stale claim. On that basis, the Section 95 application is described as time-barred and the 12-year limitation argument as rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>