<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 723 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776535</link>
    <description>Claims based on brokerage or commission adjustments, with only limited booking payments, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursal against time value of money under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The amounts adjusted against flat allotments were not money actually raised by the corporate debtor from the claimants, so the claims could not be treated as financial debt or allotment-based financial creditor claims. The attempt to reclassify the same underlying brokerage liability as financial debt was also rejected because the claimants had earlier pursued insolvency on the footing of operational debt, and the substance of the transaction remained one for commission or brokerage services rather than borrowing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 723 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776535</link>
      <description>Claims based on brokerage or commission adjustments, with only limited booking payments, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursal against time value of money under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The amounts adjusted against flat allotments were not money actually raised by the corporate debtor from the claimants, so the claims could not be treated as financial debt or allotment-based financial creditor claims. The attempt to reclassify the same underlying brokerage liability as financial debt was also rejected because the claimants had earlier pursued insolvency on the footing of operational debt, and the substance of the transaction remained one for commission or brokerage services rather than borrowing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>