<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 734 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776546</link>
    <description>The HC directed the release of the seized consignment upon the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value of the goods, noting the petitioner had already deposited Rs. 1 Crore against an anti-dumping duty liability of Rs. 27,48,995/-. The court held that the additional bank guarantee of Rs. 12,51,005/- was unwarranted. The respondent-authority was ordered to provisionally release the goods pending final adjudication, which must be conducted with due opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 734 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776546</link>
      <description>The HC directed the release of the seized consignment upon the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value of the goods, noting the petitioner had already deposited Rs. 1 Crore against an anti-dumping duty liability of Rs. 27,48,995/-. The court held that the additional bank guarantee of Rs. 12,51,005/- was unwarranted. The respondent-authority was ordered to provisionally release the goods pending final adjudication, which must be conducted with due opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>