<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 736 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776548</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the impugned order of the CIT(A). The tribunal held that the AO had erred in not granting interest on self-assessment tax and additional interest for delay under section 244A. Following precedent from the Delhi HC and coordinate benches, the AO was directed to adjust the refund in accordance with established principles. The appeal was allowed without deciding the substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 736 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776548</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the impugned order of the CIT(A). The tribunal held that the AO had erred in not granting interest on self-assessment tax and additional interest for delay under section 244A. Following precedent from the Delhi HC and coordinate benches, the AO was directed to adjust the refund in accordance with established principles. The appeal was allowed without deciding the substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>