<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 778 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776590</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order demanding tax and interest on wrongly availed ITC due to violation of natural justice, as no hearing was provided to the petitioner. The court refused to impose any deposit condition but noted the petitioner&#039;s voluntary payment of 25% of the disputed tax, which was accepted by the respondent. The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing. Petition disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 778 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776590</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order demanding tax and interest on wrongly availed ITC due to violation of natural justice, as no hearing was provided to the petitioner. The court refused to impose any deposit condition but noted the petitioner&#039;s voluntary payment of 25% of the disputed tax, which was accepted by the respondent. The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing. Petition disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>