<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1492 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463189</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore condoned the delay in filing Form 10B for audit report submission, following precedents from ITAT Ahmedabad and Gujarat HC. It rejected taxing the entire receipt due to procedural lapse, aligning with a coordinate bench ruling that only net income after expenses is taxable. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) to grant benefits under section 11 as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 06:44:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1492 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463189</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore condoned the delay in filing Form 10B for audit report submission, following precedents from ITAT Ahmedabad and Gujarat HC. It rejected taxing the entire receipt due to procedural lapse, aligning with a coordinate bench ruling that only net income after expenses is taxable. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) to grant benefits under section 11 as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>