<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>General penalty under Section 125</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120345</link>
    <description>Imposition of a general penalty under Section 125 for delayed GSTR-3B where a statutory late fee under Section 47 has been levied and paid is objectionable: absent fraud, gross negligence, or deliberate contravention, a further penalty amounts to overlapping punishment; penalties must be reasonable, proportionate and consistent with natural justice. Judicial authorities have held that where the late fee operates, a separate general penalty is not correct and may be contested.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 20:19:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>General penalty under Section 125</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120345</link>
      <description>Imposition of a general penalty under Section 125 for delayed GSTR-3B where a statutory late fee under Section 47 has been levied and paid is objectionable: absent fraud, gross negligence, or deliberate contravention, a further penalty amounts to overlapping punishment; penalties must be reasonable, proportionate and consistent with natural justice. Judicial authorities have held that where the late fee operates, a separate general penalty is not correct and may be contested.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 20:19:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>