<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM AT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45734</link>
    <description>Customs adjudication for confiscation and penalty must comply with natural justice because the authority acts in a quasi-judicial capacity. Where the decision is based substantially on witness statements recorded behind the noticee&#039;s back, the affected person must be given an opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses. Denial of that opportunity renders the inquiry unfair, and an order founded on such material is liable to be quashed in writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM AT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45734</link>
      <description>Customs adjudication for confiscation and penalty must comply with natural justice because the authority acts in a quasi-judicial capacity. Where the decision is based substantially on witness statements recorded behind the noticee&#039;s back, the affected person must be given an opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses. Denial of that opportunity renders the inquiry unfair, and an order founded on such material is liable to be quashed in writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>