<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Suit against State instrumentality dismissed for failing Section 80 CPC notice and mediation under SFC Act, 1951 compliance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91510</link>
    <description>The SC held that the suit against the appellant, a State instrumentality under the SFC Act, 1951, was not maintainable due to failure to comply with mandatory pre-institution requirements including notice under Section 80 CPC and mediation provisions. The trial court&#039;s decree was rendered a nullity for not addressing foundational issues of jurisdiction, maintainability, and applicability of the repealed Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993, which was inapplicable as the transactions predated the Act. The doctrine of sub silentio was invoked to confirm that unresolved jurisdictional objections could be raised in execution under Section 47 CPC. The decree passed without jurisdiction was void, and the exorbitant interest awarded was unlawful.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:37:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Suit against State instrumentality dismissed for failing Section 80 CPC notice and mediation under SFC Act, 1951 compliance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91510</link>
      <description>The SC held that the suit against the appellant, a State instrumentality under the SFC Act, 1951, was not maintainable due to failure to comply with mandatory pre-institution requirements including notice under Section 80 CPC and mediation provisions. The trial court&#039;s decree was rendered a nullity for not addressing foundational issues of jurisdiction, maintainability, and applicability of the repealed Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993, which was inapplicable as the transactions predated the Act. The doctrine of sub silentio was invoked to confirm that unresolved jurisdictional objections could be raised in execution under Section 47 CPC. The decree passed without jurisdiction was void, and the exorbitant interest awarded was unlawful.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:37:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>