https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776454 In fiscal disputes, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available. The HC held that the impugned orders were appealable, the issues raised were the kind routinely examinable by the appellate forum, and no exceptional circumstances justified bypassing the statutory appeal chain. The fact that the petitioner had already pursued an appeal against the adjudication order and then sought direct writ interference after an adverse outcome further supported rejection of the petition. The Court reaffirmed that the appellate forum remained competent to examine the factual and legal issues and to grant relief if warranted, so the writ petition was not entertainable. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776454 In fiscal disputes, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available. The HC held that the impugned orders were appealable, the issues raised were the kind routinely examinable by the appellate forum, and no exceptional circumstances justified bypassing the statutory appeal chain. The fact that the petitioner had already pursued an appeal against the adjudication order and then sought direct writ interference after an adverse outcome further supported rejection of the petition. The Court reaffirmed that the appellate forum remained competent to examine the factual and legal issues and to grant relief if warranted, so the writ petition was not entertainable. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776454