https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776455 Writ interference under Article 226 is permissible at the pre-enquiry stage of disciplinary proceedings only in rare and exceptional cases where the charge appears prima facie without factual foundation or jurisdictional basis. Here, the disciplinary action had not moved beyond the charge memorandum and show-cause notice, and the material did not rebut the documents relied on by the employee. The alleged distortion of public records was also not properly connected to the petitioner on the record. In these circumstances, the initiation of proceedings was treated as misconceived, and the suspension order, consequential memorandum, and charge memo were set aside. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776455 Writ interference under Article 226 is permissible at the pre-enquiry stage of disciplinary proceedings only in rare and exceptional cases where the charge appears prima facie without factual foundation or jurisdictional basis. Here, the disciplinary action had not moved beyond the charge memorandum and show-cause notice, and the material did not rebut the documents relied on by the employee. The alleged distortion of public records was also not properly connected to the petitioner on the record. In these circumstances, the initiation of proceedings was treated as misconceived, and the suspension order, consequential memorandum, and charge memo were set aside. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776455