<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776477</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,50,000/- made by the AO on cash deposited during the demonetization period. The tribunal held that the amount falls within the exempted slab limit under the Income Tax Act and CBDT Instruction No. 3/2017, which grants a blanket exemption of Rs. 2,50,000/- per person. The decision relied on precedent from ITAT Surat, confirming that such deposits up to the specified limit are not chargeable to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776477</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,50,000/- made by the AO on cash deposited during the demonetization period. The tribunal held that the amount falls within the exempted slab limit under the Income Tax Act and CBDT Instruction No. 3/2017, which grants a blanket exemption of Rs. 2,50,000/- per person. The decision relied on precedent from ITAT Surat, confirming that such deposits up to the specified limit are not chargeable to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>