<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 678 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776491</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai set aside the first appellate order and directed the AO to determine the Annual Lettable Value (ALV) of the property based on Municipal Ratable Value (MRV) in accordance with the Bombay HC ruling in Tip Top Typography, noting the AO had failed to verify MRV and relied solely on an expired lease deed. The matter was remanded for fresh determination of ALV following the HC guidelines. Regarding disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, the AO was instructed to verify the assessee&#039;s calculation and limit disallowance only to investments yielding exempt income during the year. Both grounds were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 678 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776491</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai set aside the first appellate order and directed the AO to determine the Annual Lettable Value (ALV) of the property based on Municipal Ratable Value (MRV) in accordance with the Bombay HC ruling in Tip Top Typography, noting the AO had failed to verify MRV and relied solely on an expired lease deed. The matter was remanded for fresh determination of ALV following the HC guidelines. Regarding disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, the AO was instructed to verify the assessee&#039;s calculation and limit disallowance only to investments yielding exempt income during the year. Both grounds were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>