<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 697 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776510</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petition was dismissed for a 325 day filing delay and alternatively on merits where the matter was treated as having a low tax effect; the court expressly disposed of all pending applications. The dismissal on delay and on merits were stated concurrently, but the court refrained from deciding any substantive question of law, leaving legal issues raised by the petition open. No further relief was granted against the petition due to these stated grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 697 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776510</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petition was dismissed for a 325 day filing delay and alternatively on merits where the matter was treated as having a low tax effect; the court expressly disposed of all pending applications. The dismissal on delay and on merits were stated concurrently, but the court refrained from deciding any substantive question of law, leaving legal issues raised by the petition open. No further relief was granted against the petition due to these stated grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>