<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776512</link>
    <description>Rule 22(3) of the Delhi GST Rules requires disposal of an application for cancellation of GST registration within thirty days, and the cited circular reiterates that timeframe. Where the application remained pending despite filing and follow-up, judicial intervention was warranted to secure compliance with the statutory schedule. The respondent was therefore directed to decide the cancellation application within thirty days from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776512</link>
      <description>Rule 22(3) of the Delhi GST Rules requires disposal of an application for cancellation of GST registration within thirty days, and the cited circular reiterates that timeframe. Where the application remained pending despite filing and follow-up, judicial intervention was warranted to secure compliance with the statutory schedule. The respondent was therefore directed to decide the cancellation application within thirty days from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>