https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776515 The HC held that the petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy by way of appeal. No patent breach of natural justice was found, as the petitioners had been issued a show-cause notice and given an opportunity to be heard. The refusal of adjournment did not amount to a violation, especially as no prejudice was demonstrated. The petitioners' failure to raise these issues during the original proceedings precluded deviation from the rule of exhausting alternate remedies. The petitions were disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioners to file appeals within six weeks. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeals on merits without raising limitation objections, given the petitioners' bona fide prosecution before the HC. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776515 The HC held that the petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy by way of appeal. No patent breach of natural justice was found, as the petitioners had been issued a show-cause notice and given an opportunity to be heard. The refusal of adjournment did not amount to a violation, especially as no prejudice was demonstrated. The petitioners' failure to raise these issues during the original proceedings precluded deviation from the rule of exhausting alternate remedies. The petitions were disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioners to file appeals within six weeks. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeals on merits without raising limitation objections, given the petitioners' bona fide prosecution before the HC. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776515