https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776520 Special leave petitions challenging the underlying GST dispute were dismissed because the Supreme Court was not satisfied that the matters warranted exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. The Court condoned a 105-day filing delay in the circumstances, but the dismissal rested on refusal to grant special leave. Pending applications were consequently disposed of. en-us Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:32:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776520 Special leave petitions challenging the underlying GST dispute were dismissed because the Supreme Court was not satisfied that the matters warranted exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. The Court condoned a 105-day filing delay in the circumstances, but the dismissal rested on refusal to grant special leave. Pending applications were consequently disposed of. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776520