<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trial starts over Trump administration&#039;s deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52226</link>
    <description>The central issue is whether federalising and deploying National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles to secure federal facilities and assist immigration enforcement violated the Posse Comitatus Act and federalism limits under the 10th Amendment. California seeks return of state control over remaining guard members and a bar on federal use of troops for civilian law-enforcement; the government contends troops may protect federal property and agents and take limited security-related actions. A district judge preliminarily found the federalisation exceeded federal authority, while the administration secured a temporary stay pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trial starts over Trump administration&#039;s deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52226</link>
      <description>The central issue is whether federalising and deploying National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles to secure federal facilities and assist immigration enforcement violated the Posse Comitatus Act and federalism limits under the 10th Amendment. California seeks return of state control over remaining guard members and a bar on federal use of troops for civilian law-enforcement; the government contends troops may protect federal property and agents and take limited security-related actions. A district judge preliminarily found the federalisation exceeded federal authority, while the administration secured a temporary stay pending appeal.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>