<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1745 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463174</link>
    <description>The ITAT Surat held that additions for bogus purchases cannot be made without rejecting the books of accounts or identifying defects therein, especially when sales and stock records are undisputed. The assessee produced bills, invoices, and payments via account payee cheques, indicating purchases occurred, though possibly inflated. Since sales were not questioned, the tribunal restricted the addition to 5% of total bogus purchases, aligning with industry net profit norms. Mandatory interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was upheld, but the assessee is entitled to consequential relief arising from this order. The appeal was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:56:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1745 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463174</link>
      <description>The ITAT Surat held that additions for bogus purchases cannot be made without rejecting the books of accounts or identifying defects therein, especially when sales and stock records are undisputed. The assessee produced bills, invoices, and payments via account payee cheques, indicating purchases occurred, though possibly inflated. Since sales were not questioned, the tribunal restricted the addition to 5% of total bogus purchases, aligning with industry net profit norms. Mandatory interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was upheld, but the assessee is entitled to consequential relief arising from this order. The appeal was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>