<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation Period for issuance of SCN under Section 73 of the CGST Act to be interpreted as ‘3 Calendar Months’ and not as 90 days</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14940</link>
    <description>Limitation for issuance of show cause notices under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act must be construed by calendar month computation rather than as a fixed 90 day period, with the phrase &quot;three calendar months&quot; requiring counting the same date across successive calendar months. Applying that approach to a reference date for passing an order on the annual return yields a window that includes an SCN issued on November 30 when counted back from the due date of February 28. The Court noted that, even under a day count approach, the interval equaled the 90 day span, so the notice was not time barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation Period for issuance of SCN under Section 73 of the CGST Act to be interpreted as ‘3 Calendar Months’ and not as 90 days</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14940</link>
      <description>Limitation for issuance of show cause notices under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act must be construed by calendar month computation rather than as a fixed 90 day period, with the phrase &quot;three calendar months&quot; requiring counting the same date across successive calendar months. Applying that approach to a reference date for passing an order on the annual return yields a window that includes an SCN issued on November 30 when counted back from the due date of February 28. The Court noted that, even under a day count approach, the interval equaled the 90 day span, so the notice was not time barred.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>