https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45695 Pre-execution judicial review of a detention order remains confined to narrow exceptional grounds, and prior bail in a separate Customs investigation does not by itself justify staying execution; mere delay in execution is also insufficient. The Court held that such collateral factors could not expand pre-execution interference beyond the limited grounds recognised in law, so the stay of the detention order was set aside. The detaining authority was also held entitled to maintain the appeal against the interim stay order, as it was directly aggrieved by that restraint and the absence of a co-appellant did not defeat appellate standing. en-us Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:48:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45695 Pre-execution judicial review of a detention order remains confined to narrow exceptional grounds, and prior bail in a separate Customs investigation does not by itself justify staying execution; mere delay in execution is also insufficient. The Court held that such collateral factors could not expand pre-execution interference beyond the limited grounds recognised in law, so the stay of the detention order was set aside. The detaining authority was also held entitled to maintain the appeal against the interim stay order, as it was directly aggrieved by that restraint and the absence of a co-appellant did not defeat appellate standing. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45695