<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Orders Registration Under Section 12AB, Rejects CIT(E)&#039;s Denial Based on Community Reference</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91453</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(E)&#039;s order denying registration under section 12AB, holding that the assessee trust is not solely for the benefit of a particular religion. The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) erred in concluding the trust was an AOP and not charitable based on the hostel&#039;s name referencing a specific community. The Range Head&#039;s report did not support the CIT(E)&#039;s reasoning, and the trust deed demonstrated the hostel was open to girls from other communities as well. The Tribunal held the CIT(E)&#039;s rejection was contrary to the trust deed and lacked factual basis. Consequently, the ITAT directed the CIT(E) to grant registration to the trust, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Orders Registration Under Section 12AB, Rejects CIT(E)&#039;s Denial Based on Community Reference</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91453</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(E)&#039;s order denying registration under section 12AB, holding that the assessee trust is not solely for the benefit of a particular religion. The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) erred in concluding the trust was an AOP and not charitable based on the hostel&#039;s name referencing a specific community. The Range Head&#039;s report did not support the CIT(E)&#039;s reasoning, and the trust deed demonstrated the hostel was open to girls from other communities as well. The Tribunal held the CIT(E)&#039;s rejection was contrary to the trust deed and lacked factual basis. Consequently, the ITAT directed the CIT(E) to grant registration to the trust, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>