<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 613 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776426</link>
    <description>The SC held that the appellant must approach the NCLAT to highlight any factual errors related to eligibility under section 29A of the IBC, 2016. The court clarified that the bar on review does not prevent the NCLAT from examining such factual issues. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 613 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776426</link>
      <description>The SC held that the appellant must approach the NCLAT to highlight any factual errors related to eligibility under section 29A of the IBC, 2016. The court clarified that the bar on review does not prevent the NCLAT from examining such factual issues. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>