https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776448 A dispute arising from a sale transaction and alleged non-payment of the balance price was held not to disclose criminal breach of trust, because mere failure to pay the remaining amount did not show entrustment. The Court also held that a civil recovery claim could not be converted into criminal prosecution on the facts pleaded, and that the High Court erred in treating the hardship of civil litigation as a reason to continue the criminal case. The order refusing quashing was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration. en-us Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:43:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776448 A dispute arising from a sale transaction and alleged non-payment of the balance price was held not to disclose criminal breach of trust, because mere failure to pay the remaining amount did not show entrustment. The Court also held that a civil recovery claim could not be converted into criminal prosecution on the facts pleaded, and that the High Court erred in treating the hardship of civil litigation as a reason to continue the criminal case. The order refusing quashing was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration. Case-Laws GST Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776448