<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 573 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776386</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed the appeal seeking 18% interest on delayed lease rent payments during the CIRP period. The Lease Deed provided for a 5% annual rent enhancement but did not stipulate interest on delayed payments. The tribunal held that unilateral inclusion of interest in invoices without acceptance or payment by the corporate debtor (CD) is ineffective. Prior rulings confirmed interest claims require either contractual provision or conduct evidencing acceptance. The CIRP cost claim including 18% interest was also rejected as the Lease Deed had expired before CIRP commencement. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 573 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776386</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed the appeal seeking 18% interest on delayed lease rent payments during the CIRP period. The Lease Deed provided for a 5% annual rent enhancement but did not stipulate interest on delayed payments. The tribunal held that unilateral inclusion of interest in invoices without acceptance or payment by the corporate debtor (CD) is ineffective. Prior rulings confirmed interest claims require either contractual provision or conduct evidencing acceptance. The CIRP cost claim including 18% interest was also rejected as the Lease Deed had expired before CIRP commencement. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>