<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45680</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the order imposing a penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The court found the evidence unreliable and emphasized the necessity of substantial proof to establish liability for customs violations, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45680</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the order imposing a penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The court found the evidence unreliable and emphasized the necessity of substantial proof to establish liability for customs violations, granting relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>