https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776401 ITAT RAJKOT held that the rejection of the application under section 80G(5)(iii) was due to a typographical error, as the assessee had mistakenly filed it under section 80G(5)(ii). The tribunal directed the assessee to file a fresh application under the correct provision, section 80G(5)(iii), in Form No. 10AB before the CIT(E). The CIT(E) was further directed to decide the application on merits in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776401 ITAT RAJKOT held that the rejection of the application under section 80G(5)(iii) was due to a typographical error, as the assessee had mistakenly filed it under section 80G(5)(ii). The tribunal directed the assessee to file a fresh application under the correct provision, section 80G(5)(iii), in Form No. 10AB before the CIT(E). The CIT(E) was further directed to decide the application on merits in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776401