<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776406</link>
    <description>ITAT held that, per CBDT Instruction No.1/2011, assessments where declared income exceeds Rs.30,00,000 fall within ACs/DCs jurisdiction; the ITO completed assessment without any s.127 transfer order. The s.143(2) notice issued by the ITO was therefore beyond jurisdiction and void, and the resulting assessment order was invalid. The ITAT set aside the assessment and allowed the assessee&#039;s jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776406</link>
      <description>ITAT held that, per CBDT Instruction No.1/2011, assessments where declared income exceeds Rs.30,00,000 fall within ACs/DCs jurisdiction; the ITO completed assessment without any s.127 transfer order. The s.143(2) notice issued by the ITO was therefore beyond jurisdiction and void, and the resulting assessment order was invalid. The ITAT set aside the assessment and allowed the assessee&#039;s jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>