<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 594 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776407</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore held that the TPO failed to properly analyze the assessee&#039;s functions, risks, and activities, relying solely on the transfer pricing report without verification. The assessee was found to be primarily an assembler or contract manufacturer without significant R&amp;D, unlike the large comparables used by the TPO. The matter was remanded to the TPO/AO for a fresh comparability analysis considering the assessee&#039;s actual functions, risks, marketing, and R&amp;D activities. The assessee was directed to submit detailed information and a revised comparability study. The TPO was instructed to re-examine the arm&#039;s-length price after providing the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The ground was allowed with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 594 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776407</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore held that the TPO failed to properly analyze the assessee&#039;s functions, risks, and activities, relying solely on the transfer pricing report without verification. The assessee was found to be primarily an assembler or contract manufacturer without significant R&amp;D, unlike the large comparables used by the TPO. The matter was remanded to the TPO/AO for a fresh comparability analysis considering the assessee&#039;s actual functions, risks, marketing, and R&amp;D activities. The assessee was directed to submit detailed information and a revised comparability study. The TPO was instructed to re-examine the arm&#039;s-length price after providing the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The ground was allowed with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>