<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 602 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776415</link>
    <description>The HC held the petition not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Rule 159 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioner was directed to file objections with the competent authority within 15 days, which must be decided within three months. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 602 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776415</link>
      <description>The HC held the petition not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Rule 159 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioner was directed to file objections with the competent authority within 15 days, which must be decided within three months. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>