<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (11) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45677</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition in a case involving the confiscation of zinc ingots under the Customs Act. The petitioner was directed to redeem the ingots upon payment of a fine and faced a penalty under the Act. The court found the order unsustainable due to the lack of evidence proving wrongful importation and the failure to establish the petitioner&#039;s knowledge or belief regarding the confiscation. Despite the availability of an alternative appeal remedy, the court entertained the petition based on a clear error of law in the impugned order, ultimately quashing the confiscation and penalty without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (11) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45677</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition in a case involving the confiscation of zinc ingots under the Customs Act. The petitioner was directed to redeem the ingots upon payment of a fine and faced a penalty under the Act. The court found the order unsustainable due to the lack of evidence proving wrongful importation and the failure to establish the petitioner&#039;s knowledge or belief regarding the confiscation. Despite the availability of an alternative appeal remedy, the court entertained the petition based on a clear error of law in the impugned order, ultimately quashing the confiscation and penalty without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>