<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 565 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776378</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on bright bars was held admissible where duty had been paid by the suppliers and the goods were received against duty-paid invoices from registered dealers. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that credit need not be reversed merely because the suppliers&#039; activity was later found not to amount to manufacture. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 08:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 565 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776378</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on bright bars was held admissible where duty had been paid by the suppliers and the goods were received against duty-paid invoices from registered dealers. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that credit need not be reversed merely because the suppliers&#039; activity was later found not to amount to manufacture. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>