<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776382</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated CENVAT credit under Rule 5 cannot be denied merely because a nexus between input services and exported output services is said to be unestablished, where the credit was otherwise validly taken and exports were proved. The prescribed formula and procedural requirements under the relevant notification govern the refund claim, and departmental circulars did not permit denial on nexus alone. For certain appeals, where the show-cause notices specifically alleged non-compliance with Notification No. 27/2012-C.E. (N.T.), the matter required limited remand for verification of whether the Rule 5 and notification conditions were in fact satisfied on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 08:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=842031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776382</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated CENVAT credit under Rule 5 cannot be denied merely because a nexus between input services and exported output services is said to be unestablished, where the credit was otherwise validly taken and exports were proved. The prescribed formula and procedural requirements under the relevant notification govern the refund claim, and departmental circulars did not permit denial on nexus alone. For certain appeals, where the show-cause notices specifically alleged non-compliance with Notification No. 27/2012-C.E. (N.T.), the matter required limited remand for verification of whether the Rule 5 and notification conditions were in fact satisfied on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>