<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1598 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463157</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore directed inclusion of Satyam Venture Engineering Service Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable for transfer pricing, allowing the assessee to rely solely on it for determining ALP. The TPO was instructed to recompute profit margins of Mahindra and Genesis comparables, complying with DRP directions, as per section 144C(10). Regarding interest on delayed receivables, the Tribunal held LIBOR+200 basis points acceptable instead of LIBOR+450, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s claim. On disallowance of payments to a non-resident auditor due to non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(i), the Tribunal noted that proceedings under section 143(1) merge with the assessment order and directed the AO to promptly dispose of the assessee&#039;s application under section 154 to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 12:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1598 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463157</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore directed inclusion of Satyam Venture Engineering Service Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable for transfer pricing, allowing the assessee to rely solely on it for determining ALP. The TPO was instructed to recompute profit margins of Mahindra and Genesis comparables, complying with DRP directions, as per section 144C(10). Regarding interest on delayed receivables, the Tribunal held LIBOR+200 basis points acceptable instead of LIBOR+450, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s claim. On disallowance of payments to a non-resident auditor due to non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(i), the Tribunal noted that proceedings under section 143(1) merge with the assessment order and directed the AO to promptly dispose of the assessee&#039;s application under section 154 to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>